- How The Grinch Stole the Rivalry
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. UMass
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. UNLV
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Fresno St.
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. SJSU
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. ECU
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Mississippi State
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Boise State
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU at Utah State
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Wisconsin
- How BYU’s offense & defense have stacked up since 2005
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Utah
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. LSU
- 9-Line Prediction: BYU v. Portland State
- By the Numbers: 2017 Season Preview
Hoops Résumé Check: Bracketology, NIT-ology … and bubbles!
- Updated: February 10, 2014
TEAM-BY-TEAM & PROFILE BREAKDOWN
Here is your boilerplate explanation for RPI and other ratings:
RPI (ratings percentage index) is the most well-known and prominent rating in college basketball. It may not always be the best rating, but it seems to be the most prominent one involved in the tournament selection process. So it’s important.
But to give us some more depth, we’ll look at ratings from the savant Ken Pomeroy and from Jeff Sagarin, long-time ratings calculator (and whose football ratings have been part of the BCS formula since the beginning). For a big picture number, I’ve averaged the three ratings in some places — but for the time being, RPI still remains the most important for tournament selection.
Here’s the full team-by-team and top-50/100 breakdown:
OPPONENT |
RPI |
KenPom |
Sagarin |
AVG |
+/- |
|
Weber State |
W |
173 |
170 |
169 |
171 |
+11 |
@ Stanford |
W |
38 |
35 |
29 |
34 |
+13 |
Mt St Mary’s |
W |
232 |
229 |
242 |
234 |
+15 |
Iowa State |
L |
8 |
20 |
13 |
14 |
– |
Texas (n) |
W |
23 |
38 |
40 |
34 |
– |
Wichita St (n) |
L |
6 |
11 |
16 |
11 |
-1 |
Utah State (n) |
W |
115 |
112 |
93 |
107 |
-10 |
North Texas |
W |
188 |
209 |
211 |
203 |
-31 |
UMass (n) |
L |
11 |
39 |
38 |
29 |
-8 |
Prairie View A&M |
W |
287 |
330 |
328 |
315 |
-27 |
@ Utah |
L |
104 |
44 |
54 |
67 |
+5 |
@ Oregon |
L |
40 |
32 |
35 |
36 |
+3 |
OPPONENT |
RPI |
KenPom |
Sagarin |
AVG |
+/- |
|
Loyola Marymount |
1-1 |
149 |
178 |
179 |
169 |
-20 |
Pepperdine |
1-1 |
119 |
132 |
115 |
122 |
+3 |
San Diego |
1-0 |
170 |
157 |
142 |
156 |
-12 |
San Francisco |
2-0 |
79 |
106 |
102 |
96 |
+14 |
Santa Clara |
2-0 |
220 |
177 |
180 |
192 |
+1 |
Portland |
0-1 |
158 |
102 |
101 |
120 |
+8 |
Gonzaga |
0-1 |
21 |
28 |
22 |
25 |
– |
Pacific |
1-0 |
109 |
117 |
103 |
110 |
|
Saint Mary’s |
1-0 |
56 |
64 |
58 |
59 |
vs. Top-50
RPI: 2-5
KP: 2-6
Sag: 2-5
AVG: 2-5
vs. Top-100
RPI: 5-5
KP: 3-6
Sag: 4-6
AVG: 5-6
vs. < 100
RPI: 11-4
KP: 13-3
Sag: 12-3
AVG: 11-3
Page 1: Bracketology, NIT-ology, SOS
Pages: 1 2